<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Green Bar</title>
	<link>http://greenbar.saff.net</link>
	<description>Testing the spirits since 2008</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on JUnit 4.7: Interceptors: expected exceptions by Functional HTTP testing revisited using JUnit 4.7 Interceptors &#171; Alistair Israel</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=17#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Functional HTTP testing revisited using JUnit 4.7 Interceptors &#171; Alistair Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 03:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=17#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] Interceptors in JUnit 2 JUnit 4.7: Interceptors: expected exceptions Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Unit Test, JUnit, MockObject …    Posted by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Interceptors in JUnit 2 JUnit 4.7: Interceptors: expected exceptions Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Unit Test, JUnit, MockObject …    Posted by [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interceptors in JUnit 4.7 by The Green Bar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules in JUnit 4.7</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=14#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>The Green Bar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules in JUnit 4.7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=14#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] and interpretation of test methods.  We are calling this feature Rules (replacing the earlier name Interceptors).  You can download a snapshot of this release.  We are planning no new feature for this version, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and interpretation of test methods.  We are calling this feature Rules (replacing the earlier name Interceptors).  You can download a snapshot of this release.  We are planning no new feature for this version, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interceptors in JUnit 4.7 by The Green Bar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting the name of the currently-running test method</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=14#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>The Green Bar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting the name of the currently-running test method</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=14#comment-78</guid>
		<description>[...] the latest snapshot of JUnit 4.7, we&#8217;ve re-introduced this feature, by way of Interceptors.  It looks like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the latest snapshot of JUnit 4.7, we&#8217;ve re-introduced this feature, by way of Interceptors.  It looks like [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overriding the default Runner. by David Saff</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>David Saff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Not currently.  Feature requests are appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not currently.  Feature requests are appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overriding the default Runner. by Greg</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Do you know if there is a way to override the default runner when running junit from ant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if there is a way to override the default runner when running junit from ant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JUnit 4.5 by David Saff</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=9#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>David Saff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=9#comment-74</guid>
		<description>There's not a straight-forward way to do that--feel free to open a bug at sourceforge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not a straight-forward way to do that&#8211;feel free to open a bug at sourceforge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JUnit 4.5 by Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=9#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 12:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=9#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I want to execute only specific testcases by adding in them in TestSuite file.

i didn't found any method to add only specific testcases to my suire file like addTest() method in JUnit 4.0 prior version.

if you know the solution.
please reply to me.

Thanks in advance,
Rajesh Gottapu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I want to execute only specific testcases by adding in them in TestSuite file.</p>
<p>i didn&#8217;t found any method to add only specific testcases to my suire file like addTest() method in JUnit 4.0 prior version.</p>
<p>if you know the solution.<br />
please reply to me.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,<br />
Rajesh Gottapu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overriding the default Runner. by idan shay</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>idan shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Hi David,


I thought to keep the list o listeners as you also suggest and this is what I probably do.
I think that for next version it will good if for example the class RunNotifier could be extended or/and have get/set access methods to the fields.
This will make junit more flexable like you did for the runner.

I can extend the listener to support BeforCalssStart but as you said I cant do that to the runNotifier.
Even if I override the run method in my runner to get the notifer value I still not able to access the list of listeners so I can call them from MyRunBefores.

If one of the solution I mention to get the list of listener (like add getter in RunNotifer for this field) could be added as Patch it will be great.

Thanks
Idan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I thought to keep the list o listeners as you also suggest and this is what I probably do.<br />
I think that for next version it will good if for example the class RunNotifier could be extended or/and have get/set access methods to the fields.<br />
This will make junit more flexable like you did for the runner.</p>
<p>I can extend the listener to support BeforCalssStart but as you said I cant do that to the runNotifier.<br />
Even if I override the run method in my runner to get the notifer value I still not able to access the list of listeners so I can call them from MyRunBefores.</p>
<p>If one of the solution I mention to get the list of listener (like add getter in RunNotifer for this field) could be added as Patch it will be great.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Idan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overriding the default Runner. by David Saff</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>David Saff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Even if you had the list of listeners, there's no fireTestBeforeClass, so you'd be out of luck there.  I recommend you maintain your own list of listeners that is interested in the BeforeClass event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you had the list of listeners, there&#8217;s no fireTestBeforeClass, so you&#8217;d be out of luck there.  I recommend you maintain your own list of listeners that is interested in the BeforeClass event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overriding the default Runner. by idan shay</title>
		<link>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>idan shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greenbar.saff.net/?p=11#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I extend the BlockJUnit4ClassRunner  to myCustomRunner that override withBeforeClasses to use MyRunBefores instead of RunBefores so I have the control before and after the @BeforeClass start.

The problem is that I don't have th list of listeners that are save as private fiels at RunNotifier that is private field at JUnitCore.

Is it possible to set them as protected or add getters to this fields ?

Because there are private I cannot extend them.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I extend the BlockJUnit4ClassRunner  to myCustomRunner that override withBeforeClasses to use MyRunBefores instead of RunBefores so I have the control before and after the @BeforeClass start.</p>
<p>The problem is that I don&#8217;t have th list of listeners that are save as private fiels at RunNotifier that is private field at JUnitCore.</p>
<p>Is it possible to set them as protected or add getters to this fields ?</p>
<p>Because there are private I cannot extend them.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
